tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post111817396483046181..comments2024-03-14T01:32:43.610-06:00Comments on The Geomblog: Doing the Numb3rsSuresh Venkatasubramanianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15898357513326041822noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post-1118177175364501712005-06-07T14:46:00.000-06:002005-06-07T14:46:00.000-06:00That is stupid. That crook would have gotten the ...That is stupid. That crook would have gotten the exact same effect (or better, since there wouldn't be all those bizarre withdrawals and deposits making people suspicious) if he had simply withdrawn $2^19 in the first place. Now, this method *might* have made more sense if he had put each iteration somewhere where it earned some interest... but then he wouldn't have had exactly $2^19 to make his lame scheme obvious. <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A><A HREF="http://noricum.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="mantler at gmail dot com">Andrea</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com