tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post114736546940159653..comments2024-03-14T01:32:43.610-06:00Comments on The Geomblog: On rejection and reviews..Suresh Venkatasubramanianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15898357513326041822noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post-1147633561707745932006-05-14T13:06:00.000-06:002006-05-14T13:06:00.000-06:00Perhaps the scarcest resource is the reviewer's ti...Perhaps the scarcest resource is the reviewer's time and effort. <BR/> <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A>AnonymousAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post-1147565768573558482006-05-13T18:16:00.000-06:002006-05-13T18:16:00.000-06:00For the good of your community, make a habit of em...For the good of your community, make a habit of emphasizing the positive and giving constructive reviews, especially when it comes to grant proposals where your community is competing with many other communities (and not just within itself) for the allocation of scarce resources. <BR/>The theoreticians are not bad at this, but the astronomers seem to be better. The geometry processing and visualization communities seem nastier, but then maybe it's not them, it's me… <BR/> <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A><A HREF="http://geomblog.blogspot.com/2006/05/on-rejection-and-reviews.html#comments" REL="nofollow" TITLE="snoeyink (at) cs dot unc dot edu">Jack Snoeyink</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post-1147378762289625782006-05-11T14:19:00.000-06:002006-05-11T14:19:00.000-06:00Not all areas of theory are bad with comments to a...Not all areas of theory are bad with comments to authors. My CRYPTO submissions this year had many helpful comments, for which I am grateful.  <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A>David MolnarAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com